Bean Envy Pour Over vs Lalord Stainless Steel

AheadLalord Stainless Steel is the better buy on our scoring, 9.2 to Bean Envy Pour Over's 8.4. It leads on build quality & durability and value for money.
Lalord Stainless Steel costs $15 less.
Who each one suits
One person who wants the dripper and the carafe as one object
Three sizes of steel dripper for the price most people pay for one
Scores higher on build quality & durability, value for money.
How they score, criterion by criterion
Both are scored the same way against the rest of their category, from what their makers publish. The weight is how much each criterion moves the total. How the score works
| Criterion | Weight in category | Bean Envy Pour Over | Lalord Stainless Steel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brew Quality & Consistency | 26% | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Build Quality & Durability | 16% | 9.0 | 10.0 |
| Filter Availability & Cost | 14% | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Value for Money | 12% | 7.4 | 10.0 |
What each one costs
| Price | $34.99 | $19.99 |
Where they differ
Every specification the two makers publish differently. Everything they match on is in the full table below.
| Bean Envy Pour Over | Lalord Stainless Steel | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $34.99 | $19.99 |
| Best for | One person who wants the dripper and the carafe as one object | Three sizes of steel dripper for the price most people pay for one |
| What sets it apart | Brews straight into its own carafe through a reusable steel filter, so there is nothing else to own | 399ml to 798ml with a reusable steel filter, well under the category median |
| Capacity | 591 ml | 399, 591, 798 ml |
| Made in | Not Specified | China |
Pros and cons
From each full review, written from the same published facts as the scores above.
- +A reusable stainless steel filter, with no consumable cost
- +591ml, brewing directly into its own carafe
- −$34.99 above the $29.99 median for a single size, where the AGOGO gives three for less
- −A metal filter passes oils and fines that paper holds back
- −No warranty term is published
- +$19.99 in three sizes to 798ml, with a reusable steel filter
- +Well under the $29.99 median
- −A metal filter passes oils and fines paper holds back
- −Only some parts are dishwasher safe
- −No rib design is published
Every specification, side by side
| Bean Envy Pour Over | Lalord Stainless Steel | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price | $34.99 | $19.99 |
| Who it suits | ||
| Best for | One person who wants the dripper and the carafe as one object | Three sizes of steel dripper for the price most people pay for one |
| What sets it apart | Brews straight into its own carafe through a reusable steel filter, so there is nothing else to own | 399ml to 798ml with a reusable steel filter, well under the category median |
| Specifications | ||
| Capacity | 591 ml | 399, 591, 798 ml |
| Made in | Not Specified | China |
| Dishwasher Safe | ✓ | ✓ |
| Filter Proprietary | ✕ | ✕ |
| Filter Type | Reusable Stainless Steel Filter | Reusable Stainless Steel Filter |
| Flat or Conical Bed | conical | conical |
| Material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Reusable Filter Available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ships to | US | US |
| Ships to Note | Confirmed on Amazon US, which is where this link points. Availability in other Amazon stores has not been checked, and a regional store may substitute a different product. | Confirmed on Amazon US, which is where this link points. Availability in other Amazon stores has not been checked, and a regional store may substitute a different product. |
Bean Envy Pour Over vs Lalord Stainless Steel: common questions
Which is better, Bean Envy Pour Over or Lalord Stainless Steel?
Lalord Stainless Steel scores 9.2 against 8.4, both computed from published specifications rather than opinion.
Is Bean Envy Pour Over or Lalord Stainless Steel cheaper?
Bean Envy Pour Over starts at $34.99, and Lalord Stainless Steel at $19.99.
Who is Bean Envy Pour Over for?
One person who wants the dripper and the carafe as one object
Who is Lalord Stainless Steel for?
Three sizes of steel dripper for the price most people pay for one











